|
Sonic3000 (October 11, 2008 at 1:56 am)
hey pfideo, what'chu been up to these days?
JerseyShoreChris (October 3, 2008 at 10:38 pm)
Is this Holmdel NJ ?
21cglock (September 20, 2008 at 5:59 pm)
you need to tell the judge that there is no proof that i was speeding if he had no radar evidence. You are innocent, "till proven guilty"! You also noted that the other car was going 80 with no radar!
21cglock (September 20, 2008 at 5:55 pm)
i did see a car infront of his truck on the right lane!It doesnt show that he passed you though!You were speeding and thats all!"GUILTY" for speeding!10 years in jail!lol
pfideo (September 18, 2008 at 4:55 pm)
Yes... in court my ticket was reduced from thousands of dollars of penalty to only a 2 point violation. And, WTF do you mean by argue? He asked me why I was driving at 90 MPH. Should I just agree with him?
The guy acted like a horses ASS both in court AND on the road. He lied under oath! A bold outright lie! But... the judge didn't believe him because he contradicted himself several times. Even the prosecuter knew that, because they dropped 12 point violation to 2 points!
Bazgash (September 8, 2008 at 10:14 pm)
No, in Jersey there are express lanes seperated by the regular lanes. The only difference is they don't have exits so cars arent constantly merging into and off the road which makes it "express." The cops was in the regular lane, the driver was in the express lane.
john7282 (September 8, 2008 at 3:44 am)
This video should be training of how NOT to treat a state trooper after being pulled over. Did you really think arguing with him on the side of the road was going to get you anywhere?
ChuckUFarIey (September 7, 2008 at 10:47 am)
Yes, 5 mins is a big difference in your situation. That cam clock should be syncronized daily to make sure it's always accurate.
I'm sure you are following the Shaun Malone case in Cali. It will be interesting to see what happens with that. I don't see how the court could ignore his GPS evidence.
pfideo (September 5, 2008 at 4:32 pm)
FYI: The time on the video was wrong. That is very clear because when the voice on the radio states the time, there is about a 5 minute difference. Also, the time on the ticket reflects the time I was pulled over, finally matched by my GPS (accurate to within 1000th of a second). In court no one ever mentioned the time on the video as "proof" of anything. Apparently, they don't give much importance to that clock as 5 minutes off is a pretty big number. It works as a "relative time" indicator.
ChuckUFarIey (September 3, 2008 at 10:04 pm)
The timestamp on the video is 23:55 at the time he pulls you over, five minutes earlier than you stated. If your EZPass says 11:42, then you travelled 18 miles in 13 minutes, which adds up to 83MPH.
However, the cop obviously had a bug up his ass and he should have allowed you to speak your piece in case you might incriminate yourself, but he felt you are hurting his case and he needs to fulfill his quota. |