NightLinks (October 14, 2008 at 3:39 am)

These are my favorite nasa UFO videos.

demigodlike (October 14, 2008 at 12:27 am)

I'll need to get a copy of that program on dvd. I'll invite all my friends over for drinks and watch it. We'll call it comedy night, and laugh our heads off.

Mo0ive1Us3er (October 13, 2008 at 9:15 pm)

Mythbusters are lame. Those are defientely ufos u can see them flying above the tether. This hasnt been debunked yet you tv sheep lover.

risky725 (October 13, 2008 at 3:55 pm)

This has already been tackled on Mythbusters or one of those kinds of programs. All those specs are the result of 1) the window 2) the dust on the window, 3) camera overexposure and 4) the sunrise. They did an experiment using artificial sunlight, the same type of camera, and exact replica windows with diferent degrees of dirt on them. They produced the exact same effect as you see in the video. Sorry to debunk, but the ufo theory is well, bunk. At least with this one.

demigodlike (October 13, 2008 at 1:53 am)

Btw, the reason the tether appears thicker is not because of overexposure of the camera, but by the fact the tether, a conductor cable,is supercharged with electron particles in the ionosphere. Only with a UV sensitive camera can we see any of this.

demigodlike (October 13, 2008 at 1:45 am)

Regarding your enquiry on what's happening at the 3:00 mark, where you point out one of the objects appears to shrink then enlarges again as it passes BEHIND the tether. At the moment it happens, the tether lights up and becomes more blurred which happened because there was a change in camera focus.Any time that happens, objects will appear to change in size

karadan100 (October 12, 2008 at 10:06 pm)

I'm not going to jump to the conclusion that these are aliens. It is however, very strange that one of those blobs seemed to change direction (the brightest flashing one). I didn't manage to find any that changed speed though. It's interesting that the tether seems very fat when it's actually quite thin. surely the same could be said for the debris? The flashing is just due to spinning objects with reflective surfaces. The shapes are indicative of lens flare from reflective 'motes' of dust.

WarrantedFaith (October 12, 2008 at 8:08 pm)

First, let's grow up. What is wrong with you people? There is no reason to get upset over this. You're acting like a bunch of 12 year olds throwing a whiny fit just because someone actually doesn't agree with you. Marlin, assertions are not proof. Your claim has no weight against my suggestions and questions if you cannot demonstrate how you know these objects are in fact as large as they appear and are not simply reflections on the camera lens, which can appear at any size.

WarrantedFaith (October 12, 2008 at 8:06 pm)

I haven't watched the video responses yet. I often reply to other people's comments without watching videos if you've found any comments on other videos. And your constant attempt to sidestep the point is not helping your case.

marlinbird5 (October 12, 2008 at 7:44 pm)

the reason why you are retarded is because this tether stretches 12 MILES LONG! with that said that gives you a size to scale of the objects floating in the foreground... these objects are around 1-3 miles long based on an EASY fundamental observation of their size relative to the rest of the tether. The point is not whether or not ufos are real, however how encapsulated your mind is from the reality, only so that you can feel as tho you are smarter-- which you have clearly displayed you arnt