djlmerco (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

k so where'd the towers go then, idioot?

biscuitsNgravvvvy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

so many pidgeons in new york why people think it was doctored

chibangin007 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

that isnt a plane. lol. that looks like a retarded bird lol. listen to these idiot reporters trying to make us believe that image was real... lol! wow i cant believe that people still buy into the false story of planes hitting the towers. those images were FAKE!!!!

guitaristxcore (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Nothing doctored or undoctored about this video. The plane angled as it went in, light reflection caused it to blend in with the back ground, POS camera couldnt differentiate. Fastest birds in the world? Hardly. They flew past closer to the lense than the buildings were. Not a hard concept to grasp.

IRSFRAUDEXPOSED (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

OwGebpA97UM vs. l_MnCPxwKoY pax 5 video is real except for the fake wing drawn on

IRSFRAUDEXPOSED (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

first impact on this video ...notice, the GREY smoke from wtc 1 is grey. and the object looks like a missle dredded up like a plane , wing dissapears apon impact. other vidios of same shot have blackened colored in smoke and edited "plane" i believe this is a rare undoctored shot , it shows how low the fire was in north tower and why all hli shots would not show this object from this low southrn location.

IRSFRAUDEXPOSED (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

from a boat

IRSFRAUDEXPOSED (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

looks like left wing drawn on missle dissapears on impact?

mattedwards33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

that's odd, considering you can get PHONES with 2.0-5megapixel cameras, which have video recording functions, and if i'm lying, you explain :)

DianitaStar88 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

funny lol